MITRE ATT&CK content depth
Curated ATT&CK content with OpenText threat-research analyst perspective. Programs get content plus context rather than raw framework data.
OpenText • Security operations
Adversary Signals (formerly OpenText Core Adversary Signals) delivers MITRE ATT&CK-aligned adversary intelligence, TTP correlation, and actor profiling content into SOC workflows so detection and response anchor on real adversary tradecraft rather than IOC-only patterns.
Through Merito, the MITRE ATT&CK content from Adversary Signals gets integrated into TDR and Enterprise Security Manager, mapped against existing detection coverage to surface gaps, and operationalized into hunt-program workflows so SOC investigations carry adversary context end to end rather than as shelfware.
What it is
Among OpenText's SecOps products, Adversary Signals is the one that tracks adversaries. It pulls MITRE ATT&CK-aligned content (tactics, techniques, procedures, threat-actor profiles) into SOC workflows, correlates observed activity against known adversary tradecraft, and gives SOC analysts actor and TTP context on alerts. Programs running SIEM and UEBA without adversary intelligence detect anomalies, while programs adding Adversary Signals detect anomalies in the context of who is doing what.
MITRE ATT&CK alignment is the load-bearing capability. ATT&CK is the industry-standard adversary-tradecraft framework, and SOCs that map detections to ATT&CK techniques get richer triage context, gap analysis (which techniques the SOC is not catching), and threat hunting structured around adversary patterns rather than ad-hoc IOC chasing. Adversary Signals provides curated ATT&CK content with OpenText threat-research analyst perspective on top.
Its adversary content is used across OpenText's SecOps products. Threat Detection and Response (SaaS SIEM), Enterprise Security Manager (on-prem SIEM), Network Detection and Response, Behavioral Signals (UEBA) and Threat Intelligence (curated IOCs) all consume it. Connected to them, it makes SOC operations adversary-aware, and used on its own it delivers the content without that workflow integration.
The content only matters if the SOC puts it to work. Programs that subscribe to ATT&CK content, push it into the SIEM, and never use it for hunt or triage gap analysis end up paying for content that nobody references. Implementation designs the operational pattern, covering which detections map to which techniques, the gap-analysis cadence, how hunt programs use adversary content and how threat-actor profiles inform IR response. Without that, the subscription is shelfware.
Ideal use cases
What it is best at
Curated ATT&CK content with OpenText threat-research analyst perspective. Programs get content plus context rather than raw framework data.
Profiles of major threat actor groups with TTP mapping, target sectors, and historical activity. SOCs anchor IR on actor patterns rather than generic IOC chasing.
ATT&CK and actor context is delivered natively to TDR, Enterprise Security Manager, NDR, Behavioral Signals and Threat Intelligence.
Maps existing detections to ATT&CK techniques and surfaces gaps. Programs see which adversary tradecraft is unmonitored.
Structures threat-hunting programs around adversary content rather than ad-hoc IOC chasing.
Core capabilities
What Adversary Signals actually delivers as a content stream.
MITRE ATT&CK technique content
Curated ATT&CK content covering tactics, techniques, and procedures across the framework.
Threat-actor profiles
Major threat actor groups with TTP mapping, target sectors, and historical activity.
Campaign and incident analysis
Curated analysis of major campaigns and incidents for IR and detection-engineering reference.
OpenText threat-research perspective
Analyst commentary on top of raw framework content, with sector-specific context where relevant.
Turning content into operational SOC capability.
Detection-coverage mapping
Maps existing detections to ATT&CK techniques. Surfaces coverage gaps.
Hunt program enablement
Structures threat-hunting around adversary content rather than ad-hoc IOC chasing.
Investigation enrichment
Adversary context attached to SOC investigations for triage acceleration.
Adversary content flowing into the SecOps line.
SIEM integration
Adversary content feeds Threat Detection and Response and Enterprise Security Manager.
UEBA enrichment
Adversary context enriches Behavioral Signals scoring.
Threat-intel integration
Pairs with OpenText Threat Intelligence for IOC plus TTP coverage.
NDR enrichment
Network Detection and Response signals enriched with adversary context.
Where it fits in the stack
Deployment and implementation
Licensing and packaging
Adversary Signals
Standard SaaS edition with curated MITRE ATT&CK content and threat-actor profiles.
Best for: SOCs adding adversary intelligence to detection and response.
Adversary Signals with Threat Intelligence
Bundled with OpenText Threat Intelligence for IOC plus TTP coverage.
Best for: Programs consolidating adversary intelligence and threat intelligence subscriptions.
Merito services
Pick the engagement that matches where you are in the lifecycle.
Content integration, detection-coverage mapping, hunt-program operationalization, IR-context wiring.
Explore serviceSOC program scoping for Adversary Signals alongside Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, and specialist providers.
Explore serviceHunt program operationalization and detection-coverage gap analysis.
Explore serviceNamed engineer, priority SLAs, and release-time coverage for Adversary Signals.
Explore serviceLong-term run support including content integration maintenance, hunt-program evolution, and detection-coverage updates.
Explore serviceRole-based training for detection engineers, threat hunters, and IR leads.
Explore serviceDetection engineers and threat hunters fluent in ATT&CK mapping, working inside your SOC.
Explore serviceOpenText Adversary Signals licensing
Adversary Signals pricing arrives with content integration, detection-coverage mapping, hunt-program operationalization, and IR-context wiring that turn adversary content into adversary-aware SOC operations rather than shelfware.
Merito point of view
Some SOCs subscribe to ATT&CK content, drop it into the SIEM, and never reference it again. Adversary intelligence becomes shelfware when nobody maps existing detections to techniques, runs gap analysis on coverage, or anchors threat hunts on adversary tradecraft. Adversary Signals suits programs willing to operationalize ATT&CK, and for programs that only want a checkbox subscription, the value is muted.
Adversary Signals makes most sense in programs already running OpenText SecOps products, where threat hunting and detection engineering are real disciplines and incident response anchors on actor profiles. Programs that need specialist threat-intelligence breadth should also look at Recorded Future and Mandiant Advantage, and scoping compares them side by side.
Adversary-aware SecOps depends on pairing it with OpenText Threat Intelligence. Threat Intelligence covers IOC depth (specific known-bad infrastructure), and Adversary Signals covers TTP depth (how adversaries operate). Running both gives IOC-plus-TTP coverage, while running just one gives half the picture.
What buyers usually underestimate
Related from Merito
Related solutions
Related services
Related products
Frequently Asked Questions
Consultation request
Tell us how your SOC detects and hunts today, which SIEM it runs, and how incident response uses threat context. A Merito OpenText specialist follows up within one business day.
MITRE ATT&CK depth
Curated ATT&CK content, threat-actor profiles, and OpenText threat-research perspective.
Operationalize
Content alone is shelfware. Merito wires it into detection coverage, hunt programs, and IR context.
Next step
A Merito Adversary Signals engagement starts with detection-coverage mapping and hunt-program design. Adversary content without operational integration is a checkbox subscription.